Live $ vs. Streaming $ – Which Comes First?

This is an interesting article comparing live revenue to recorded music revenue.  It also compares the current era vs. “the old days,” which were really only about 10-15 years ago.  Read this quote:

“The reason the Weeknds of the world and the Drakes of the world are exploding is a combination of a global audience that’s consuming them freely at a young age [and that] they just keep dropping music…They’re delivering an ongoing, engaged dialogue with their fan base.” Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino

However, the article states, there may be limits to the growth of the live music industry.  It comments on the 2016 revenues of Live Nation, America’s biggest event promoter.  Live music is not a growth industry anymore.  It has matured and its gains come more from higher ticket prices now than incrementally more tickets sold.

So if streaming is on the rise, and it is, can recorded music catch up?  Can the old model of live music promoting the recordings, as opposed to the opposite current model, return?  Probably not.  Streaming rates are still too low.  And not enough people are subscribing.  The numbers are going up, fast.  But, if you read in a separate article HERE, more subscribers do not necessarily mean more money for artists (both writers and those who play on the recordings).

Some folks in the industry still say we’re in the Wild West of a new paradigm.  Maybe.  Or maybe the west was already won by the lords who came up with the original per-stream rates.  From an artist perspective, why would you expect anyone to offer to pay you more?  “Just because” doesn’t work here.


For full details about the Music & Entertainment Industries Program, including courses, the minor, and our MBA, click HERE.

For full details about the WPU Pop Music Studies Program, including courses and audition requirements, click HERE.


Professor David Philp is Assistant Professor Music & Entertainment Industries and Popular Music Studies at William Paterson University. He is the co-host of the only FREE advice college radio-based music & entertainment industry talk show in America, Music Biz 101 & More, which airs live most Wednesday nights and is available as a podcast HERE every night (days too).  Your favorite professor is also co-author (with Dr. Steve Marcone) of Managing Your Band – 6th Edition.  Reach him at or find him on LinkedIn HERE.

One Reply to “Live $ Vs. Streaming $ – Which Comes First?”

  1. For me, the current business model of music streaming is dead-end. As gaming sector showed, a freemium solution can’t be treated as business salvation or the-only-one. It’s very difficult and troublesome. Present status of music streaming leads to the situation where one listened stream will be worth less than zero, sooner or later. As you probably know, one paid user equals eight users who use this service free thanks to advertising. And this ratio hasn’t been changed. It’s a vain hope that a significant part of freemium listeners will be convertible in an undefined future. This is the most flawed assumption which I’ve ever heard. The biggest opportunities for platforms such as Spotify or Deezer are laid in their data. By the same token, I believe big data will be a next big thing in streaming service. Turning this market into big data-powered music marketplace will boost hopes for the music industry.

    But now music industry is like turkeys voting for Christmas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.